Monday, November 18, 2013

Salve for recovering from the last post.

Since so many have complained about lasting damage from the last post, I thought it might be necessary to give the masses what the clamor for. Interestingly enough Speedos for women are quite Victorian by comparison to the male version. Perhaps that is what it is that bothers people so much. Granted I didn't give you David Beckham types, I gave guys that should probably not been wearing said style. Although c'mon, Rod Stewart was a sex symbol back in the day.

Well anyhow I hope that the following images stir feelings in you that you are completely comfortable with.

I'm feeling patriotic.





Just remember the Budgie is watching you!

photoshopcontest.com
And so is Zardoz!


26 comments:

  1. Excellent!!! Ah a breath of fresh air and then..............wtf!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bwahaha! But you gotta cut me some slack. Those were some babes leading up to it.

      Delete
  2. WTF is that Bond's new outfit...
    Rest of the pictures are very soothing :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Zardoz was a bizarre movie Sean Connery was in during 1974. IMDB here.

      Delete
  3. Come on. guys. That Zardoz pic has to be pointed social comment these days. I mean to say, Sean Connery had your actual body hair, what stated frankly to the world at large, 'I'm a bloke, and IDGARA (I don't give a rat's a---) who knows it.' The demand for the removal of blokey bodyhair is part of the emasculating conspiracy seeking to turn guys into gals - I state it candidly. Who else would shove estrogenous chemicals into the water supply (and the joke is, they've got us lads doing it to ourselves via what they are pleased to call 'mens toiletries', for Pity's sake!), who else would set as the standard of masculine masculinity the androgenous types adorning - I use the word ironically - the covers of magazines....

    Rant... splutter... snort...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi AP, Mr. Connery is definitely a man's man. I just found the diaper, bandolier, thigh boot combo quite odd.

      Delete
    2. M'mm, yeah. I can see where you're coming from...

      Delete
  4. Must be some kind of economy drive? Clearly these ladies are trying to save money by cutting down on the amount of cloth in their costumes...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was waiting for Zardoz to pop up at some point. Nice one!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Lee, I completely missed it the first time around. That's why I had to include it in this one.

      Delete
  6. From budgie smugglers to peanut smugglers and then the sucker punch! Ouch, my head is in a spin. Nurse!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry Matt. As I explained above there were some I missed that I had to include.

      Delete
  7. For the most part Sean, this is much, much better! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Replies
    1. Michael, I'm glad that I have righted this grievous wrong to the sensibilities of bloggers worldwide.

      Delete
  9. It doesn't help with my partial blindness!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'll have number two pleas with extra baby oil and I'll pay £10 towards acting lessons for number seven.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds good Gary. I think she comes with her own 50 Gal drum of the stuff.

      Delete
  11. Replies
    1. Glad to hear it Paul. See what you avoided by being deployed.

      Delete
  12. Andrew you need to develop the 1000 yard stare when looking directly into the eyes of the Budgie.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Poor girls! Not enough money to buuy proper clothes! Let them stay poor!!!! :-D
    My eyes are ok, I saw the little pieces of textile!

    Greetings
    Peter

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Peter, in these troubled times we all have to make sacrifices. They have obviously sacrificed using large amounts of material.

      Delete